Michele-lee Phelan ([info]artoftheempath) wrote,
@ 2008-03-18 08:52:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Why I No Longer Paint Digitally
I woke this morning, feeling restless. The moon is waxing, coming closer to fullness and this month it seems to be affecting me a little more than it usually does. I find myself being reflective and thinking upon moments in my life where my path has changed dramatically, and has led me to a places I would not have expected. Several days ago, someone came to me asking for a commission. They mentioned a digital painting I had painted several years ago, citing it as the reason why they were deciding to contacting me. They loved it. They wanted me to paint something similar for them. They wanted me to do a digital painting because my traditional works were not realistic enough.

This is the painting in question ...




When I read the email, I found myself shaking my head, wondering if I would ever be free of the curse of this painting. For if there was one painting where I had moments when I wished I had not painted it, it would be this one. It is a painting that marked a major turning point.

This painting was, and is, a lie in what it represents to those who come seeking me as a client. It is why I no longer showcase it online in my gallery or in my portfolio. It is the most realistic digital artwork I have ever painted, and to this day it remains unmatched by any digital artwork I have painted. It was one of those artworks I delighted in painting. I was so proud of the finished result, and yet, now I look at it now and wonder if I should ever have painted it. My other digital works were more similar in style to my traditional works. This one was not the same because I was striving for a more photorealistic image. By today's standards, she's probably not that amazing, but she will always be pretty darned special to me because I created her with an ancient wacom -- one of the first ever made -- and Paintshop Pro V5, which was not made for painting with at all.

But if it were me, I would have made note of the fact that it was so strikingly different to the other artworks in the gallery.

If I had not painted it, then maybe the clients who wanted me to recreate this beauty would have not come my way. They would not have noticed me. My journey would have been different, yes, but it would have been a little more 'honest'.

You see, by the time I had finished this painting I had already decided that I would be taking the harder path and learning how to paint by traditional means with real paint. Why? Because I was developing RSI from the time spent at the computer. My eyes were not liking the constant exposure to the glare of the monitor. I was developing back problems from hunching over my little wacom, and having problems with headaches due to staring at the screen for extended periods.

It was not a case of no longer wanting to paint digitally, but no longer being capable of it. Occassionally, the desire to paint without mess would sway me again, and thinking that enough time had elapsed for the problems to have all gone away I would do something with my computer. But it was always a struggle. The hurts, the headaches, and the problems would always come back, reminding me painfully of why I stopped in the first place. It slowed down my progress and made it difficult for me to improve because I could not practise and further develope the skills I was learning.

I never mentioned these problems to anyone other than my partner, and he only got the whinging and whining about the discomfort I was experiencing. Maybe I should have made it public knowledge. Maybe if I had, I would not be questioning past decisions. Maybe I would not find myself regretting the time spent painting this artwork, because maybe, just maybe, others would have not had such high expectations.

This artwork led clients to me, each of them expecting me to match it, even though I was no longer painting digitally. Traditional mediums are so much more unpredictable than digital. For one thing, there is no 'undo' button on a paint brush. Oh how much easier would my job be if there was. Learning to paint by traditional means has been a lot of hard work. I have painted almost every single day for the last four years in order to get where I am now. I look back at what I have accomplished and I am proud of myself. And yet, there are moments in my career over the last few years that lessen the joy I feel, because I chose not to disclose the true reasons as to why I was no longer painting digitally.

For the public record, I stopped painting digitally because it was affecting my health. I already have poor vision, I could not afford to worsen it due repeated eye strain and dry eye. I had begun to lose feeling in three fingers of one hand, and experience permanent pins and needles, swelling, and pain from fingertips to wrist. I purchased a larger wacom and Painter several years ago, hoping that use of the proper tools and software would alleviate the problems I was experiencing. It did not. In fact, if anything, the problems worsened. Like some develope a sensitivity to the chemicals in traditional paints, I had developed a sensitiviy to digital paint. It ended my career as a digital artist.

The transition from one to the other was not easy for my clients. Some were happy with the traditional artworks they recieved, others were not. Some where honest in their delight, because they had something real, something tangible to have forever, while others where honest in their disappointment. They had wanted digital. They wanted a level of realism that I had not yet mastered with traditional mediums.

While there were one or two digital artworks that came after this one, I did those ones for others, not myself. I tried again in order to make others happy, but I could not continue because it hurt too much. The last digital artworks I painted were for the Ancient Mirror's Tales. They were my last. I know it's not wise to tempt the Fates and declare that one will never do something ever again, but I can be very confident in my declaration that I will never paint digitally again -- digital/traditional hybrids maybe -- but a digital artwork from start to finish? It won't be happening. It took me weeks to get the feeling back in my hand after the last digital painting. In the end, it was not worth it.

So instead of looking upon the artwork above, and wanting me to create something similar, I would ask that you look upon the artworks in my gallery, here and at Deviant Art, and my journal and decide whether you want something created similar to how I work now in the present. The painting above marks an ending. It marks the end of my time using digital. It is an artwork of which I am very proud. I refuse to regret its creation any more, but nor will I have everything I do, everything I have struggled to achieve over the last few years compared to it and found wanting.

I am not a digital artist due to health reasons first and foremost, but over the last few years I find that there's another reason too. I am not a digital artist, because over time I'm finding I no longer have much liking for digital art. Oh, don't get me wrong, there are digital artists out there whose work I love, because they have a unique style that sets their work apart. They have taken the time to develope a style that is all their own.

But these days it seems that every second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth artist has jumped on the photo-realism bandwagon. Yes, the works of many are undeniably beautiful, but they look just like the next artist's work. Why? Because instead of developing a style that is their own, they are all attempting to mimic the style of another. Digital art for me, has for the most part, become boring. I find that these days I look for traditional artists, because digital art bores me witless because the bulk of it all looks the same.

That's the beauty of traditional art. No matter what we paint, or the medium we use, each and every artist is set apart from the next. I do believe that so many of us are different because we don't all strive for photo-realistic art, and until it is no longer the holy grail for the majority of digital artists, they will continue to be, in my humble and somewhat biased opinion, the 'manufactured pop' artists of the art world.

Don't mistake my words for an attack. 'Manufactured pop' musicians are some of the biggest and most successful in the music industry, BUT, their fame is always shortlived, while other bands who have developed their own sound and style develope cult followings that keeps their music alive for decades. 'Manufactured pop' is often great to listen to, gets your toes tapping, and yet when the next song begins the last one was and is forgotten.

That is what photo-realistic digital art has become -- beautiful, enjoyable, and ultimately, forgettable unless the 'artist' has taken the time to develope a style that makes them memorable.

So please, no more requests that I paint digitally something that matches the artwork up above -- an artwork that was painted four years ago. I no longer paint digitally and have not now for almost two years. This will not change in the forseeable future. Nor do I strive for photo-realistic art. I like hard lines too much. It's part of how I paint. It's part of my style. It's not going to change. The art that you see in this journal, and on my websites that I have painted over the last year is 'me'. It's as honest I can be.

In Addendum: I am not dissing digital art as a medium, nor implying that it is not a valid choice of medium or to use it means that you are any less an artist. I am taking a swipe at photo-realistic art and the fact that many digital artists sacrifice, or do not develope a style of their own in order to achieve realistic art, believing they cannot have the former if they wish to achieve the latter.


(Post a new comment)


[info]haikujaguar
2008-03-18 12:31 am UTC (link)
Anytime people use a tool for the sake of the tool, the results are going to be inferior to someone who uses the tool as a means to an end.

Bravo to you for all your hard work. :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:07 am UTC (link)
Thankee, lovely :)

You are right, I cannot help but feel a lot of artists use digital because it is so convenient. They use the tool because it is easier, less messy, less costly, takes less space, etc, and I cannot help but wonder how much better their art would be if they were forced to learn their trade by using traditional methods first.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]haikujaguar
2008-03-18 01:13 am UTC (link)
Well, I can't say... I know the reason I don't do digital work, but... you know, the virtual versus non-virtual medium debate really does draw the fireworks.

But for my part, I like your traditional work better than this digital piece you linked. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:19 am UTC (link)
Oh yes, -that- debate will rage forever, but truly, I cannot help but feel that if you have not experienced both traditional and digital mediums you cannot make a valid arguement that one is better than the other.

For me, traditional is better on so many levels. For others, it is not, but that does not make my opinion any less valid or justified. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]haikujaguar
2008-03-18 01:22 am UTC (link)
Sooth. I too have done them both, and know what you mean. :)

Me, give me a unique original, a piece of paper that has seen the touch of another human's hands and that is precious partially because it will deteriorate and one day be gone.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:27 am UTC (link)
Aaah, but yes, the digital artists would say that a digital file will live forever ...

Or until the next hard-drive failure ;)

Really, joking aside, when it comes to the medium itself I have no issue. I would paint digitally if I could paint digitally, but I can't.

It's more the need to do coldly perfect photo-realistic art that looks just like the last artist's work that destroys my delight in the medium itself.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]haikujaguar
2008-03-18 01:28 am UTC (link)
Heh. In this I am a sensualist. I love the tactile quality of real media. I love the smell and the texture. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:36 am UTC (link)
Me too. I'm very tactile and a very sensual creature. The thing is, I love the way the wacom pen slides across the tablet just as much as I love the way paint slides across the page. With my old wacom, the one I replaced, it was not a pleasurable experience, but this new one is a delight to work with. There is an almost velvety feel to the way it moves.

But it has it's pitfalls. Sadly, the tools also have their side effects, just as traditional mediums do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]moonvoice
2008-03-18 12:58 am UTC (link)
I have a Wacom now, to develop my own style... and I must admit the lure of developing a photorealistic style has been there... but it is quashed time and time again by my knowledge that that is not - and has never been - the kind of artist I want to be. I am heavily stylised in my artwork, even by some other artists standards, so now I just want to see if that translates to the Wacom. I hope so!

I love your traditional artwork, more than that digital piece, because traditional artwork has a rawness and reality to it that digital finds it difficult to attain.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:05 am UTC (link)
I still use my wacom almost every day for cleanup work on the digital files of my artwork, and it's an absolute blessing for doing graphic design, but the simple truth is that even just typing the post above has left my wrist aching and the tingle has started again.

You know, I look at that digital piece, and then look at my current Zeus painting and I really don't feel that there is much of a difference between the two. Both are stylised, both have elements within them that make each of them mine, but one leaves me happy and the other leaves me cold.

Developing a unique style, in my opinion, is as important as learning how to use the medium itself. Style is what attracted me to your work in the first place. It's unique, and even if you did cross over to digital, your style would still shine through and set you apart, because there are elements to it that are so very you that you would not give them up.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kirstinmills
2008-03-18 01:05 am UTC (link)
I agree with all your sentiments on digital art. It has no passion or magic to me. I love seeing how something was created, traces of the artist in the artwork. Although looking at your digital piece, I knew it was yours straight away and don't find it differs from the rest of your works much at all. I think, especially in your recent traditional works, you are approaching a similar level of realism anyway, and the composition and handling are definitely yours. You even used the digital medium to approach an acrylic appearance :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:12 am UTC (link)
*laughing* Yes, I said something similar to pia only a few moments ago. My style is obvious on both, and my traditional works are now reaching a similar standard of realism, but I've also retained elements in my tradtional work that will always make them less than photo-realistic.

I don't know how many clients have approached me because of the digital piece. I would say at least 25% of all my clients have mentioned it in their initial contact email or follow up email, and it's still happening even after I've removed it from all of my online galleries.

But to have someone ask me to paint something similar digitally because my current works were not photo-realistic enough?? Well, that had me scratching my head just a little bit.

Honestly, I think the only difference is that the digital painting is 'smoother' and in many ways a little colder.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]uminomamori
2008-03-18 01:08 am UTC (link)
I love lines to very much too :D

I don't recall every seeing that picture before and I don't think it's in any way better than your traditional work. If I spent the same amount of time digital painting as I did on a watercolor my hands would hurt too and and when I do not having an original will always annoy me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:17 am UTC (link)
*grins* Yay for lines! ;)

That picture was one I never really displayed much. It was online ever so briefly which is why I am always amazed when it is mentioned in commission requests. It sometimes feels like that painting is seen as the sum weight of my existance and that annoys me a little because one, the painting is ancient when you look at my artistic timeline, and two, my current paintings now match it if not exceed it in realism. The thing is, I also like seeing obvious brush strokes in my trad works. While I try for nice smooth skintones, it's obvious that they were painted with a fluid medium, not with pixels. I think that's the element that a lot of people crave -- the flawless smoothness of photo-realism.

Give me lines and brushstrokes please.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]starrydance
2008-03-18 01:28 am UTC (link)
I look at the digital image, and I look at your Gaia card, and I know which one I want! Obviously, there is a time difference and it creates a skill difference, but ............

Well whatever. =p We all have our preferences, and yay for that, right! But Ill keep my messy hands, dropping the ink bottle and all! =3

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]uminomamori
2008-03-18 01:51 am UTC (link)
My favorite digital artists - Kiriko Moth, Erin Kelso, Olga Ulanova, apricot8585 all use lines :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:57 am UTC (link)
Yes, and while they strive for realism, they do not sacrifice personal style in order to achieve it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]starrydance
2008-03-18 01:24 am UTC (link)
A short answer to a very long and heartfelt post, but I agree wholeheartedly.

I found myself so caught up in the digital 'how' wasnt listening to the music of the artwork, was fighting the programs.

I see artist after artist going digital. I know its 'easier' to a certain degree and its definitely cheaper and has more colors, more options but the 'race to photoreal' while I admit I appreciate looking at it, is not what adorns my walls and catches my attention on online galleries. I cant say WHY traditional art catches my heart and digital pretty much doesnt - but thats the way it is, so that is what I am going to paint.

Somedays I wish I was still digital as far as 'ease to start to finish' skipping all the scanning, multiple steps, unfixable oops, color correction, size changes, seeing errors later and going ugh! But Im really very much happier that I am what I am.

Nothing can beat that beauty of a mixing color, the joy of getting a new paint tube in the mail and watching to spread on the paper, the sheer high of finishing a artwork and holding it in your hand!

I cant say why it 'is my way', but it is. And I definitely dont miss all the physical side effects from digital painting myself -- although I was no where near your calibur of ouchie <3

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]haikujaguar
2008-03-18 01:29 am UTC (link)
Dunno about it having more colors... have you seen the gradient on a real sunrise? o_O

Analog has its uses!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:32 am UTC (link)
For me, there is nothing really that different between digital and traditional when it comes right down to the bones of the medium itself. Painting with acrylics, and painting with Painter requires much the same technique. I could pic up my wacom pen and paint something almost identical to what I paint traditionally, except it would be smoother.

As I mentioned above in other comments, it's not the medium that I question -- it's the fact that many digital artists don't take the time to develope a style that it is all their own. In their quest for the photo-real, they have sacrificied a uniqueness that will set their work apart and make them memorable.

That aside, I do love working with real materials. I adore having that original right there at the end, and I actually like the fact that I can't go and change the things I mess up, because it allows me to see my improvement from one painting to the next.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]starrydance
2008-03-18 01:42 am UTC (link)
The interesting thing is several digital artists I know 'cant paint' outside their chosen program or without their special brushes. Which is very, very interesting to me.

But, yes, one of the reasons I decided to go purely traditional so I could focus on the process of drawing, painting, and all that as opposed to looking up brush tutorials, and 'tricks'.

Although theres a lot of tricks traditionally too! *laughs*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-18 01:48 am UTC (link)
I have, over the last few years, met a good number of artists who can paint both digitally and traditionally. However, the majority of those were painting traditionally first and found the transition to digital to be quite painless. Those who started painting digitally first found the transition to traditional a lot more difficult.

There are tricks to both, but I will say until my dying day that if you can paint by traditional means then you will be quite capable of painting by digital means, but if you can only paint digitally? You might find that traditional mediums are far less kind. They have to be coaxed, cajoled, and bullied a little more, and if you mess up, they are far less forgiving.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]starrydance
2008-03-18 01:58 am UTC (link)
I suppose that eventually thats my overall point! Of course people take shortcuts in ALL medias, but its so much easier to jump 'straight to finished painting' in digital that I know I found myself not as careful with the details.

I could just do 'whatever' overhere and 'fix that proportion' over here and then drop in a background and .. tada!

With watercolor, no waaaaaay. (And if you can, dont you dare tell me!) I have to pre plan every little detail and make sure its all drawn as well as I can before I can so much as touch color to paper!

That said, Ive always adored the daily sketch threads out there on the largest art forums where people sculpt these amazing artworks with a basic brush in a short amount of time -- but then again, those are in general people that have learned 'how to draw and paint' not 'learned how to use the medium'.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]astein142
2008-03-18 04:06 am UTC (link)
I understand completely. I started with digital, but switched to traditional, for much the same reason -- my health. I have a form of arthritis similar to rheumatoid, and I lost fine motor control in my mousing hand. After all, digital is all about one motion -- the clicking of the button with the index finger. Well, for me it was. I switched to traditional watercolor because it was less stressful on my hand, while at the same time requiring enough movement to maintain flexibility. At the same time, I lightened my subject matter from the macabre to the whimsical -- also much better for my (mental) health. Yet I still get requests for the darker, more realistic digital work, and I'm still looking for an audience for my lighter, traditional whimsies.

(Reply to this)


[info]brigidashwood
2008-03-18 12:45 pm UTC (link)
I am so happy that you are on the path that works for you Mich. I adore your work and have enjoyed greatly watching your style evolve over the years. While I feel that I see in this digital painting definite signs of your style I find I don't prefer it to your traditional works. I somewhat recently made an opposite transition. Although it was a year of training and practicing in this new digital medium before I have finally felt that I could share anything I was creating. I found it very challenging. I have worked in traditional mediums for years. And I think this gives me a great advantage with this move to traditional and I cannot fathom how anyone paints digitally without traditional training. The program I use (Painter) has a palette even for traditional color mixing. And I hope my digital pieces continue to reflect my style. Personally I think the problem with digital is because there are so many ways to achieve the same effect in a painting. Either through a plugin or through just directly painting it. That people are unsure if what they are looking at is authentic. However the reality is that even in traditional mediums this can be a potential problem. I have always felt that a well trained eye can pick out a piece using less then handworked techniques every time. Whether it is traditional or digital I can tell if the artist relied to heavily on tracing or plugins etc. There are many ways to paint digitally. From photomanipulation to paint overs to traditional methods in a digital medium. I find that digital is going through the same process that many other mediums have through the history of art. Pastels were considered cheating..the blending was too easy. Airbrush was abhorred as barely even art. And watercolor originals in fine galleries have only in the past 50 years really started selling at a rate comparable to their oil counterparts. For me digital has been a dream come true. Like yourself I did not feel challenged by the other mediums I had been using. I felt I had come as far as I was going to with oils and watercolor and egg tempera. I longed to explore other themes in my art such as more complex ornamentation and and to experiment more. Digital has allowed me to do this with a greater freedom. So glad you have found what works for you and it certainly shows in your work. You are an amazing artist. Hugs

(Reply to this)


[info]ariesroses
2008-03-18 03:22 pm UTC (link)
Do what you want to do. Overall your work is amazing. I think your creativity is just stunning. As for traditional and digital...hey at least you tried it..you know. You found out what works for you. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]pixiewildflower
2008-03-18 10:44 pm UTC (link)
*hugs hard* I understand your choice hon. It's right for you!

(Reply to this)


[info]deerwoman
2008-03-20 03:40 am UTC (link)
Thank you for this post. I also used to dabble in digital art (technically, I still create it with regard to graphic design pieces) and was very interested in it when I was younger. However, as I've gotten older, I've almost entirely abandoned it and have honestly lost the desire to use the medium. My reasons are not related to health per se, I just find so much more satisfaction in traditional media. As [info]haikujaguar also spoke of herself, I am a sensualist and digital media is rather cold and impersonal. I love beautiful brushes, bottles of ink, even paint-encrusted containers I use for water. The fact that you cannot edit > undo mistakes in traditional media is also one of its strengths. If you make a "mistake" with traditional media, you have to exercise the creativity to turn that "mistake" into something valuable and integral to the piece. I've learned a lot of lessons from having to transforms mistakes into important aspects of a piece, and oftentimes the unexpected accidents are the things which add personality and life to an image. With digital media, I think the compulsion to undo your mishaps makes images static because there is no real dialog going on with the artist and her materials.

I think that photorealism in digital work is so prominent because of that fact - people can continually edit their work to make it look as sleek and unblemished and ideal as possible. Sadly, a lot of people only evaluate the quality of a piece (and by correlation the artist) by how realistic it looks. This isn't limited to digital media though. I recall reading somewhere that a man once came up to Picasso and asked him what value there was in his pieces since they didn't look like anything he would see in real life. Picasso asked the man if he had a picture of his girlfriend. The man pulled out a small photo from his wallet and showed it to him. Picasso then asked the man if his girlfriend was really that small.

I am personally very irritated for instance on deviantART where carefully rendered copies of photos of celebrities and well-known images receive daily deviation status. I don't feel that it's fair because by honoring these pieces 1) they are not acknowledging the original photographer who was the one to actually compose, light the shot, and 2) they are implying that these images are of equivalent value to ones which are completely of an artist's creation.

Anyways, sorry for the long reply, but I greatly sympathize :)

(Reply to this)


[info]treasa
2008-03-20 10:02 pm UTC (link)
You know, thinking back, that particular piece of work has caused you all sorts of problems. It is amazing, but for something that was supposed to be a private commission, it sure has made the rounds on the internet. I mean, how many times have you found it included in collections of sparkly tags and borrowed works that didn't give you credit for the original work? And now, this. I'm liking your recent stuff a lot better.

I was looking at Hal Marcus' gallery the other day and was reminded of a (rats, the two fish astrological sign) you did years ago, and wondered if I should take it to him and see what he thinks about it, but thought I might also be betraying your confidence and also misrepresenting you, since you've moved on to more realistic, less illustrative works, so I decided not to, but sometimes, I itch to show off your work and get professional feedback on it.

(Reply to this)


[info]damewindhunde
2008-03-30 09:16 pm UTC (link)
I respect your desire to only work traditional mediums but if ergonomic issues are the only thing keeping you from digital work as well, I’d like to recommend the Cintiq pressure sensitive tablets, you draw directly on them and they much better replicate the “real” feel then wacom tablets. I own a Cintiq 12WX and the larger 21UX and they are great tools, I can’t praise them enough for being awesome and easy and COMFORTABLE to use.
http://sighthoundlady.deviantart.com/art/Cintiq-21UX-20166556
http://sighthoundlady.deviantart.com/art/Cintiq-12WX-72443271

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]artoftheempath
2008-03-30 09:30 pm UTC (link)
*laughs* Yeah, I've seen the cintiq, but I can't afford nor justify the cost when only a small part of my portfolio will ever be digital art.

I will always use traditional, as ergonmic factors were not the only reasons why I chose traditional over digital. There is the 'original' component that I feel is very important. I use traditional not just for health reasons, but because I derive quite a good income from orginal artwork sales through sales of my own works and through commissioned works. It is a simple fact that I cannot ask the same price for an artwork that does not have an 'original' hard copy component. A digital print is all I will ever have and while I have always offered 'digital' among medium choices for commissions, most who want commissions -want- the original artwork. It's why they hire me in the first place.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…